Kirjutas Croat, 20.05.2022 at 14:21
Won vs. Mobster
Kirjutas Xenomega, 05.05.2022 at 00:11
What in the tarnation is this
I used to record duels against low ranks just in case they ever ended up wall fucking me and rushing t2, it's happened 5 times. Every time I talked to Eagle he helped me out and deleted. When I was lower rank this really threw me off, of course any "pro player" can defend quite easily and win but lower skilled players who cannot defend are punished by this.
Since there are CW formalized rules, why not duels? why can one not apply the same rules to duels? I understand its limiting nature, but given proof and screenshots why should such noob plays be enabled by this.
I am fine with no holds bar duels, I have done them before (wfing t1, rewalling, wall bypassing , serb walling all allowed), its a fun practice. But where do we draw the line when one player operates with courtesy and the other disregards formalities. It should be both playing under the same set of rules or no rules at all.
Would you rather we assume by default no rules? how will this help settle disputes amongst duelists who play by different rule sets? This inconsistency breeds more rules via settling these disputes than simply having a standard in the first place
Kirjutas juiceytunes, 29.04.2022 at 12:09
Kirjutas Sid, 28.04.2022 at 17:48
Kirjutas juiceytunes, 28.04.2022 at 15:25
Even if the ai's ARE easy. Just having the option to use them is good enough. what's the downside?
This has been discussed a lot, it hasn't been done because programming even a basic AI would take a lot of time and resources that AtWar's never had. I believe someone said atwar would be especially challenging because there isn't like gridpoints? Might be wrong about that.
Ah okay. So the downside is that it'd be difficult as hell? Understandable. Sorry for wasting your time!
Kirjutas juiceytunes, 29.04.2022 at 09:47
I genuinely want to know why people think this would be a bad idea. Ai would make this the perfect web based strategy game in my eyes. Even if they ai is a little lackluster.
Kirjutas Sid, 28.04.2022 at 17:48
... I believe someone said atwar would be especially challenging because there isn't like gridpoints? Might be wrong about that.
Kirjutas juiceytunes, 28.04.2022 at 15:25
Even if the ai's ARE easy. Just having the option to use them is good enough. what's the downside?
Kirjutas Reichsheer, 22.04.2022 at 15:52
It's on the map makers to fix things that shouldn't be there in the first place. It's been 11 days since I posted this and Dave hasn't even glanced on the page.
Why has atwar been in a downward spiral? The powers that be see zero importance in maps and their makers. I'd like to see a single veteran map maker say they're happy in the current state of the map-making side of the game.
Do you want new players that stay? I seem to remember a map-making renaissance in atwar's heyday.
Kirjutas Ruse, 20.04.2022 at 10:54
Kirjutas Sid, 19.04.2022 at 10:45
No mod started anything, they just let me aware of it. I removed diz's minimod because I mentioned twice in the message I send to minimods not to abuse and then I saw a ss of dizabo fucking around. I was only like 70% sure your post was satire and not an actual abuse report.
So while it was satire, I still don't think a new minimod should be fucking around tbh. Its really a test imo.
I love diz but he's not going to be a minimod.
can you talk to him that i didn't report him. he thinks i reported him to you about his admin powers.
Kirjutas Witch-Doctor, 25.01.2021 at 23:04
I tried making an icon for heli and a drone. Maybe Dave can use them if they're good enough.
Heli
Drone
Kirjutas Mobster, 03.08.2021 at 13:42
I tried making some new, it'd be good to have them in the new scenarios (DireWarlord's new WW2 for example)
Heavy Artillery:
Mechanized:
Tank Destroyer:
Anti-tank:
Horse Archer:
Archer:
Ancient Infantry:
War Elephant:
King:
Fighter:
Rocket Artillery:
Nuke:
Dragon: