Uued postitused

Kk

I knew he loved femboys all along.

Yes and we will pump and dump it asap!

Well I think it can be a fun addition.
Tho as someone who doesn't spend money online, I don't see how I'm gonna get any ._.

Why don't we release a meme coin? Maybe PUMPFUN ? I think we're a great community with hundreds of players

Kirjutas Oleg, 24.01.2026 at 04:42

Kirjutas Palmitas09, 23.01.2026 at 13:22

You put Germany and Czech as maybe but Lithuania as sure? What is the thinking there? Also armenia yes but nothing around it?

because i have family in both countries bruh

Kirjutas Spartans300, 24.01.2026 at 20:11

I am bringing up an old topic, but I would strongly urge the developer(s) (Hi Dave....lol) to eliminate the ability to make walls in the water with land units. Only ships should be able to make sea walls, not militia, Inf, tanks and certain special units (in other maps). If we do this across all maps/scenarios, then we can eliminate unbreakable sea walls with land units in maps that don't have bombers (e.g., various Ancient games, etc.).

Dave, I know you are quite busy, but this will make a big difference both common sense-wise and to stop cheaters using this tactic in specialty maps. It makes no sense that a soldier treading water, wearing a life preserver can stop ships or planes.

Thanks!

I agree. Will take me a while to get around to it. I don't know when. But I agree it's silly what we let those guys in life preservers get away with

Kirjutas Wesmorr, 20.01.2026 at 11:01

In the main menu of the game when you first click the link, there appears to be a "like to obtain helicopters" text/speech bubble, it is not interactable, nor is there any like button below it or on the page.

hey, if you let me know how much SP the upgrade would cost you then I can give them to you since the feature isn't working at the moment.

I am bringing up an old topic, but I would strongly urge the developer(s) (Hi Dave....lol) to eliminate the ability to make walls in the water with land units. Only ships should be able to make sea walls, not militia, Inf, tanks and certain special units (in other maps). If we do this across all maps/scenarios, then we can eliminate unbreakable sea walls with land units in maps that don't have bombers (e.g., various Ancient games, etc.).

Dave, I know you are quite busy, but this will make a big difference both common sense-wise and to stop cheaters using this tactic in specialty maps. It makes no sense that a soldier treading water, wearing a life preserver can stop ships or planes.

Thanks!

I am making a map. I made a simple fortification unit under the classification Building:Other because I don't want it to have the +1 DEF bonus of a Building:Defence .

Problem I found out recently is that the Industrial Powerhouse strat makes Building:Other cost $0 (free), ruining the scenario balance. It is done this way because in World Map, only Radar Array and Naval Battery is Building:Other, so it's good that its free with that chosen strategy.

My question is if I change it to Building:Defence, and it has a high DEF, it means it will be first defender of any battle in the city, meaning it will be killed first. So please answer this: if it is killed first, will the +1 DEF bonus to all other units in the city disappear once it is killed during a battle?

Gc

Update #23 - Conscripts patch #2
v2.1.3

---

Changelog (24/01/26):

Units:

• +20 cost, -1 capacity for Transport Truck.
  Balancing Heavy Artillery beign transported by trucks.
  
  
• -3 critical chance for Arab Tribes.
  
• -100 cost for Submarine Effort.
  
• "Cruiser" removed from Qu'aiti.
  Minor changes.
  
  
• "Italian Mobilization" added to Northern/Central/Southern Italy.
  Reinforcements building for Kingdom of Italy (available from turns 1 to 13).
  
  Finances:
  
• -25 income in Konstantiniyye.
  
• +25 income in Ottoman Supremacy (Black Sea).
  Giving more relevance to Black Sea.
  
  
• -100 income in Corfu.
  
• +100 income in Monastir.
  To prevent Monastir from being used as a financial drain.
  
  
• -500 starting funds for German Empire (West).
  
• -1000 starting funds for German Empire (East).
  Adjusting changes from Volga patch #1 v2.0.1.
  
  Cartography:
  
• Argel → Algiers.
  
• Tunes → Tunis.

Kirjutas Palmitas09, 23.01.2026 at 13:22

You put Germany and Czech as maybe but Lithuania as sure? What is the thinking there? Also armenia yes but nothing around it?

Kirjutas Palmitas09, 23.01.2026 at 13:25

Kirjutas Charlie Kirk, 20.01.2026 at 19:10

[img[/img]

Putting Bolivia and Peru in Maybe is insanity. Do you know how ugly woman there are? and id rather live in Africa than in Those shit places. Maybe I know how it looks very well cuz of geoguessr but fucking hell you do not want anything to do with that!

Well, i like to think there is beauty everywhere you look for it, as long as its not india or africa. also to be fair i would be discriminated against in africa whereas in south america as long as i have south american gf ill prob be fine

Kirjutas Charlie Kirk, 20.01.2026 at 19:10

[img[/img]

Putting Bolivia and Peru in Maybe is insanity. Do you know how ugly woman there are? and id rather live in Africa than in Those shit places. Maybe I know how it looks very well cuz of geoguessr but fucking hell you do not want anything to do with that!

Kirjutas Mr_Own_U, 19.01.2026 at 00:09

Love is evoL

-world maps or europe maps, but any is okay
-EST (GMT -5)
-Looking for friends and people to play with to develop better skills. I'm a huge fan of turn based strategy games.

Permanent ban on Tengri

What sorcery is this!?

Cool

P.S There is no Singapore on this map.

In the main menu of the game when you first click the link, there appears to be a "like to obtain helicopters" text/speech bubble, it is not interactable, nor is there any like button below it or on the page.

Kirjutas Uruguay, 18.01.2026 at 13:06

This is where I would live as an indian


Where would you live?
https://whereidlive.com

confusing name, Uruguay but hates its province (Uruguay) and its country (Argentina)

Kirjutas NegTheEskimo, 18.01.2026 at 23:59

So I began to have doubts in hindsight, even though i try to comfort her and sedate her with you know what, the labour is yet to start, the doubt comes from that does she really have a good connection with me, cause she mentioned that she never really fell in love with me, according to her she just simply grew up on me. While it is same in my case, I didn't really had butterfly in my stomach when I was dating her, but I was always really fond of her, I liked her, I liked the sex, I like how communicative, comforting and accepting of me. Question arises in my head, does it really have to be a red hot love to have it healthy? Without it, the road is all too bumpy and mistrusting? I don't know, one thing is for sure, even though I didn't have this strong hormonal temptations for her at first, I still love her. I take care of her, I worry about her, I want her to be happy and have a good life. But is it for her side? Does she want the same.

It doesn't have to be "red hot" love to be healthy.

A lot of people confuse butterflies and obsession with "real love", but those feelings are usually just the early-stage infatuation. That rush can be fun, but it isn't the thing that keeps a relationship longterm. What matters more is whether you two choose each other through actions: care, honesty, respect, effort, and showing up when it's hard.

I was in a long relationship that started as a friendship. There wasn't some magical attraction at the beginning. It was more like we grew into each other, we broke up from our past relationships in the similiar time and decided to comfort each other. It lasted for 4+ years, and even though it's not the happy ending story because we ended it, we ended on good terms and it was a mutual decision. And that actually taught me something important: real love isn't an imaginary magnet that just happens and then guarantees forever ever after. Real love is something you choose every single day you wake up.

In the years what I learnt is that it is more important to share common goals and similiar point of view about life with a person you consider to be your life partner - rather than moments of infatuation. Also, take her words with a grain of salt until her pregnancy ends - you will both regret the decisions you might make based on these.

Kirjutas NegTheEskimo, 18.01.2026 at 23:59

Question arises in my head, does it really have to be a red hot love to have it healthy? Without it, the road is all too bumpy and mistrusting?

My wife and I have been married 10 years, and we've been together for a total of 15 years. Something I've learned: love is a choice.

Sure red hot love can happen and it's nice when it does. Maybe it lasts a long time, maybe it doesn't. But that's not what keeps a relationship going for the long term. What does keep a relationship going is both partners choosing to love each other.

For me it's easy to love my wife because naturally we get along so well. That helps. Still we have been through many stressful situations together. We've had fights with each other, and with the world. As soon as the anger dies down enough we can think rationally again, we've always chosen to love each other and we've always worked things out somehow.

There's nothing special about us. We don't have any superpowers. We just both feel that the fairy-tale version of life is unrealistic. Expecting to be happy 100% of the time is unrealistic. Real life is hard. So we choose to support each other and try to make each others' lives a little better. And here we are, 15 years together and still going.

One other thing: after your baby is born, he/she will be your wife's #1 priority for a long time. This is normal and how it should be. After a while you may start to feel sad that your wife isn't paying as much attention to you, that's normal too. Resist the temptation to do anything stupid. Your child will always be first priority, but things will start to balance out over time. Don't worry.