Buffing RA

Ra is the most useless stretegy to ever be made i dont see the point it is useless in 99% of games competative or scerio only rpfags pick ra...

Ra needs a buff

Tank
3+ crit for tanks
1+ movment
1+ attack

Infantry

4- crit
2- view range
1- range
1+ attack
1-defence

Bombers

1+ attack
2- defence





(this will never get implimented)

Kirjutas Brsjak, 15.01.2017 at 09:33

Ra is the most useless stretegy to ever be made i dont see the point it is useless in 99% of games competative or scerio only rpfags pick ra...

Ra needs a buff

Tank
3+ crit for tanks
1+ movment
1+ attack

Infantry

4- crit
2- view range
1- range
1+ attack
1-defence

Bombers

1+ attack
2- defence





(this will never get implimented)

Correct, for one amok is dead inside and this game is never getting worked on. For two laochra worked tirelessly for the entire last year he was mod to nerf ra and blitz. You wouldn't want to destroy laochras entire legacy in 2 seconds would you?

Kirjutas Helly, 15.01.2017 at 09:39

Kirjutas Brsjak, 15.01.2017 at 09:33

Ra is the most useless stretegy to ever be made i dont see the point it is useless in 99% of games competative or scerio only rpfags pick ra...

Ra needs a buff

Tank
3+ crit for tanks
1+ movment
1+ attack

Infantry

4- crit
2- view range
1- range
1+ attack
1-defence

Bombers

1+ attack
2- defence





(this will never get implimented)

Correct, for one amok is dead inside and this game is never getting worked on. For two laochra worked tirelessly for the entire last year he was mod to nerf ra and blitz. You wouldn't want to destroy laochras entire legacy in 2 seconds would you?

only time i found ra usefull is playing prussia in ww1 but still it is slow and blitz is better :/

edit:why did he nerf it

Kirjutas Brsjak, 15.01.2017 at 09:43

Kirjutas Helly, 15.01.2017 at 09:39

Kirjutas Brsjak, 15.01.2017 at 09:33

Ra is the most useless stretegy to ever be made i dont see the point it is useless in 99% of games competative or scerio only rpfags pick ra...

Ra needs a buff

Tank
3+ crit for tanks
1+ movment
1+ attack

Infantry

4- crit
2- view range
1- range
1+ attack
1-defence

Bombers

1+ attack
2- defence





(this will never get implimented)

Correct, for one amok is dead inside and this game is never getting worked on. For two laochra worked tirelessly for the entire last year he was mod to nerf ra and blitz. You wouldn't want to destroy laochras entire legacy in 2 seconds would you?

only time i found ra usefull is playing prussia in ww1 but still it is slow and blitz is better :/

RA can be viable I use it once in a while, it is effective in scenario play, as ukraine in 3v3 and in high income games.

Kirjutas Helly, 15.01.2017 at 09:45

Kirjutas Brsjak, 15.01.2017 at 09:43

Kirjutas Helly, 15.01.2017 at 09:39

Kirjutas Brsjak, 15.01.2017 at 09:33

Ra is the most useless stretegy to ever be made i dont see the point it is useless in 99% of games competative or scerio only rpfags pick ra...

Ra needs a buff

Tank
3+ crit for tanks
1+ movment
1+ attack

Infantry

4- crit
2- view range
1- range
1+ attack
1-defence

Bombers

1+ attack
2- defence





(this will never get implimented)

Correct, for one amok is dead inside and this game is never getting worked on. For two laochra worked tirelessly for the entire last year he was mod to nerf ra and blitz. You wouldn't want to destroy laochras entire legacy in 2 seconds would you?

only time i found ra usefull is playing prussia in ww1 but still it is slow and blitz is better :/

RA can be viable I use it once in a while, it is effective in scenario play, as ukraine in 3v3 and in high income games.

it isnt i play only scenrios and you always go imp or pd, ra has big potential as an offensive start

RA is horrendous in it's current form.

I agree,it could use a buff BUT,the buff you proposed is too much imo.

A thing like this takes time anyway so even if amok would implent this you would have to wait.

Keep in mind, part of the reason RA was nerfed is it is an initial starting strat. When RA was nerfed, one of the reasons was to promote new players to experiment with other strategies. New players learn a lot less about the game mechanics if their initial strategy is so powerful, they never have to learn how to use another.

I left 2 messages to ivan to reduce the 40 cost militia to 30, i'll have to remind him again.

Its foolish to think RA is useful in scenarios, its even worse than in Eu

Kirjutas Helly, 15.01.2017 at 09:45

Kirjutas Brsjak, 15.01.2017 at 09:43

Kirjutas Helly, 15.01.2017 at 09:39

Kirjutas Brsjak, 15.01.2017 at 09:33

Ra is the most useless stretegy to ever be made i dont see the point it is useless in 99% of games competative or scerio only rpfags pick ra...

Ra needs a buff

Tank
3+ crit for tanks
1+ movment
1+ attack

Infantry

4- crit
2- view range
1- range
1+ attack
1-defence

Bombers

1+ attack
2- defence





(this will never get implimented)

Correct, for one amok is dead inside and this game is never getting worked on. For two laochra worked tirelessly for the entire last year he was mod to nerf ra and blitz. You wouldn't want to destroy laochras entire legacy in 2 seconds would you?

only time i found ra usefull is playing prussia in ww1 but still it is slow and blitz is better :/

RA can be viable I use it once in a while, it is effective in scenario play, as ukraine in 3v3 and in high income games.

Bro RA is totally useless

Kirjutas Permamuted, 15.01.2017 at 16:20

I left 2 messages to ivan to reduce the 40 cost militia to 30, i'll have to remind him again.

And +1att to tanks like PD inf gets +1 def.

Kirjutas brianwl, 15.01.2017 at 15:55

Keep in mind, part of the reason RA was nerfed is it is an initial starting strat. When RA was nerfed, one of the reasons was to promote new players to experiment with other strategies. New players learn a lot less about the game mechanics if their initial strategy is so powerful, they never have to learn how to use another.

1}the problem is still more then 70% of low ranks (6-) use ra
2}Ra is useless if it was removed from the game i think no one will give a fuck so atm you can remove ra and nothing significent will happen (probobly nobody will spot it)


see any r6 or lowers most used starts you will see ra as the top or even worse only ra

Kirjutas Brsjak, 16.01.2017 at 08:02

Kirjutas brianwl, 15.01.2017 at 15:55

Keep in mind, part of the reason RA was nerfed is it is an initial starting strat. When RA was nerfed, one of the reasons was to promote new players to experiment with other strategies. New players learn a lot less about the game mechanics if their initial strategy is so powerful, they never have to learn how to use another.

1}the problem is still more then 70% of low ranks (6-) use ra
2}Ra is useless if it was removed from the game i think no one will give a fuck so atm you can remove ra and nothing significent will happen (probobly nobody will spot it)


see any r6 or lowers most used starts you will see ra as the top or even worse only ra

exactly

RA sucks

Thank Laochra for nerfing everything that could compete with PD.

Kirjutas Azula., 17.01.2017 at 07:24

Thank Laochra for nerfing everything that could compete with PD.

Ignoring the fact that i was the driving force behind the boosts on if, ds, gc, lb, hw, gw, imp and ra in order to bring atwar out of the pd/blitz orientated meta of 2013/2014. I was pretty successful in that regard. But hey lets not let such mundane things as facts get in the way of a good opportunity to moan about blitz being nerfed. Good old el, nice to see you havent changed in the past year.

Kirjutas Permamuted, 17.01.2017 at 09:16

Kirjutas Azula., 17.01.2017 at 07:24

Thank Laochra for nerfing everything that could compete with PD.

Ignoring the fact that i was the driving force behind the boosts on if, ds, gc, lb, hw, gw, imp and ra in order to bring atwar out of the pd/blitz orientated meta of 2013/2014. I was pretty successful in that regard. But hey lets not let such mundane things as facts get in the way of a good opportunity to moan about blitz being nerfed. Good old el, nice to see you havent changed in the past year.

Kirjutas Permamuted, 09.01.2017 at 09:09

Kirjutas Helly, 15.01.2017 at 09:45

Kirjutas Brsjak, 15.01.2017 at 09:43

Kirjutas Helly, 15.01.2017 at 09:39

Kirjutas Brsjak, 15.01.2017 at 09:33

Ra is the most useless stretegy to ever be made i dont see the point it is useless in 99% of games competative or scerio only rpfags pick ra...

Ra needs a buff

Tank
3+ crit for tanks
1+ movment
1+ attack

Infantry

4- crit
2- view range
1- range
1+ attack
1-defence

Bombers

1+ attack
2- defence





(this will never get implimented)

Correct, for one amok is dead inside and this game is never getting worked on. For two laochra worked tirelessly for the entire last year he was mod to nerf ra and blitz. You wouldn't want to destroy laochras entire legacy in 2 seconds would you?

only time i found ra usefull is playing prussia in ww1 but still it is slow and blitz is better :/

RA can be viable I use it once in a while, it is effective in scenario play, as ukraine in 3v3 and in high income games.

no hell ra suks k

Kirjutas Waffel, 17.01.2017 at 09:21

Kirjutas Permamuted, 17.01.2017 at 09:16

Kirjutas Azula., 17.01.2017 at 07:24

Thank Laochra for nerfing everything that could compete with PD.

Ignoring the fact that i was the driving force behind the boosts on if, ds, gc, lb, hw, gw, imp and ra in order to bring atwar out of the pd/blitz orientated meta of 2013/2014. I was pretty successful in that regard. But hey lets not let such mundane things as facts get in the way of a good opportunity to moan about blitz being nerfed. Good old el, nice to see you havent changed in the past year.

Kirjutas Permamuted, 09.01.2017 at 09:09