|
This has been said many times b4, but we need a better system for passing host, it would be much simpler to choose who you want to pass to then passing and hoping it doesnt go to an afk or a troll or a dick, like in ww2 sometimes its given to the rnak 5 hitler who kicks all then plays by himself, its a waste of time not to be able to select
Laadimine...
Laadimine...
|
Death1812 Konto kustutatud |
Death1812 Konto kustutatud
Support
Laadimine...
Laadimine...
|
|
Laadimine...
Laadimine...
|
|
Kirjutas Guest, 22.08.2014 at 11:07
Support
Laadimine...
Laadimine...
|
|
Good idea
----
The church is near, but the road is icy... the bar is far away, but I will walk carefully...
Laadimine...
Laadimine...
|
|
Yes. Pick player to pass the responsibility... or just stay in game and be responsible yourself.
----
Laadimine...
Laadimine...
|
|
Bump
Laadimine...
Laadimine...
|
|
Yes please. Also make it possible to pass ownership before picking.
----
We are not the same - I am a Martian.
We are not the same - I am a... divided constellation?
Laadimine...
Laadimine...
|
|
Support, we should be able to choose the host among the list of premium players that are inside the match
Laadimine...
Laadimine...
|
Black Shark Konto kustutatud |
Black Shark Konto kustutatud
Support
Laadimine...
Laadimine...
|
|
Yes. Pick player to pass the responsibility... or just stay in game and be responsible yourself.
^^
By picking the person who you want to be host is like playing 3v3 and kicking people because you dont like them L0L. What if that person hates people and kicks who he doesn't want.
Laadimine...
Laadimine...
|
|
Kirjutas Waffel, 09.10.2014 at 08:05
Yes. Pick player to pass the responsibility... or just stay in game and be responsible yourself.
^^
By picking the person who you want to be host is like playing 3v3 and kicking people because you dont like them L0L. What if that person hates people and kicks who he doesn't want.
Isn't this risk higher if you can't pick your substitute host? There s this inherent risk, that can only be avoided if you don't pass host and stay in game. Or, am I missing the point?
----
Laadimine...
Laadimine...
|
|
Kirjutas Waffel, 09.10.2014 at 08:05
Yes. Pick player to pass the responsibility... or just stay in game and be responsible yourself.
^^
By picking the person who you want to be host is like playing 3v3 and kicking people because you dont like them L0L. What if that person hates people and kicks who he doesn't want.
Isn't this risk higher if you can't pick your substitute host? There s this inherent risk, that can only be avoided if you don't pass host and stay in game. Or, am I missing the point?
True, but that limits your way off leaving/dropping the game without ensuring you to rejoin or not , which supports to not rejoin when some1 picks near you or something.
Laadimine...
Laadimine...
|
|
Laadimine...
Laadimine...
|
Exo-K Postitused: 403 Kasutajalt: Australia
|
Being able to pass host to a certain person would be a lot easier and it wouldn't be something to difficult to add in i believe
Support
----
The best players are those who think outside the box and aren't afraid to try something new
Laadimine...
Laadimine...
|